On 8/20/05, email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Forgive me for jumping in here in the middle of a conversation but
I can't push these thoughts from my mind... Are all of
these observations supported by the simple fact the modifications to
the data dictionary ARE logged (recursive SQL) So the entries
into the obj$ tables as a result of the new objects would be logged as
well as the extent allocation actions.
Yes, the changes to the data dictionary are all logged.
You can see this by the small amount of redo generated even when
inserting with append hint that results in a new extent (DMT
obviously). So the block operations on the index may not be
logged but the changes to the schema are logged.
Yup. There's some other stuff in there as well. A session
with logminer would reveal what is being logged.
Also I consider it unwise to create *persistent* segments use
nologging option for exactly this reason. But indexes can always
be rebuilt, but at what cost? (how many days processing?)
Unless you do direct path loads or use the APPEND hit, all DML will be logged.
If you can save a lot of time and resources by doing so, then why not do it,
unless you have a very good reason not to?
Back it up afterwards and you will be able to recover.